Audit and Feedback
Improving Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Care
Audit and Feedback (A&F) is a quality improvement strategy that involves measuring professional performance, with results subsequently provided to clinicians and/or their teams to encourage positive change in clinical practice. A&F has been rigorously studied and shown to improve antibiotic prescribing in primary care, as demonstrated by this systematic review and meta-analysis of 56 randomized controlled trials.
The design and implementation of A&F is critical for its success. Key considerations are how the desired outcomes link to a particular change in behaviour. Recipients of A&F should be able to understand the data presented to them within seconds, and be able to connect the data to their prescribing behaviours. Brehaut et al. summarized 15 suggestions for optimizing the effectiveness of A&F. Schwartz et al. provide 13 best practice recommendations for implementing antibiotic A&F in primary care. This toolkit can help with designing and assessing these A&F interventions.
Canadian ANtibiotic prescribing feedback initiative: Building a national framework to combat AntiMicrobial Resistance in primary care (CANBuild-AMR)
Background: Rising antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a threat to modern medicine and society as a whole. In 2019, over 1.2 million global deaths were attributable to AMR. Misuse and overuse of antibiotics are important contributors to this health crisis, and national actions are necessary to slow AMR to mitigate its detrimental impacts, where we can no longer effectively treat bacterial infectious diseases. Over 90% of antibiotic usage in humans is in the community setting, and 25-50% of these antibiotic prescriptions are unnecessary, making this sector a critical partner for antimicrobial stewardship efforts. Peer comparison audit and feedback is rooted in behavioural science and is effective at improving antibiotic prescribing. Mailed antibiotic feedback letters reduce overall antibiotic prescribing, save money, and does not increase the risk for serious bacterial infections. Previous work has shown that physicians use this data to reflect on their antibiotic prescribing practices and make small changes to improve appropriate antibiotic prescribing. Tools from Choosing Wisely Canada are available to support Using Antibiotics Wisely.
Aim: This project aims to develop a Canadian AMR collaboration to reduce antibiotic use through prescriber feedback in primary care. It will build national capacity to deliver feedback at scale and evaluate its effectiveness. The CANBuild-AMR project will standardize and optimize feedback interventions, providing an efficient evaluation mechanism. By expanding existing programs, we will reduce unnecessary antibiotic use, improve patient care quality, lower costs, and combat AMR.
Methods: CANBuild-AMR has developed a steering committee and developed an antibiotic feedback intervention incorporating principles of behavioural science and best practices for audit and feedback. The letter was developed through stakeholder engagement from across Canada and through user-tested design from front-line family physicians. All participating provinces and territories (P/T) will leverage existing programs and resources to provide antibiotic prescribing feedback to prescribers. This project is anticipated to begin in November 2025.
Ethics: Antibiotic prescribing feedback is a quality improvement initiative that can be delivered without informed consent. Physicians can opt out of future feedback reports through their respective province or territory (select region below). The study has been approved by the Public Health Ontario Research Ethics Board (2024-017.01) and at each local P/T as required.
If you received antibiotic prescribing feedback and looking for more information and/or references please select your province or territory below:
-
MD Snapshot-Prescribing: Improving Physician Prescribing Awareness and Supporting Good Patient Care
The College of Physicians & Surgeons of Alberta (CPSA) provides personalized quarterly prescribing data to Alberta’s prescribers through an online tool called MD Snapshot-Prescribing. This tool is designed to support prescriber awareness and self-reflection and allows prescribers to compare their prescribing practices against peers within their comparator groups. Learn more about CPSA’s MD Snapshot-Prescribing here.
TPP Atlas: Supporting Informed, Data-Driven Prescribing Practices
The Tracked Prescription Program (TPP Alberta) releases an annual interactive online resource called the TPP Atlas. This is a publicly accessible resource that provides detailed insights into prescription drug utilization and trends in Alberta. It focuses on medications with higher potential for misuse and includes five years of data. Explore the TPP Atlas here.
Looking for additional prescribing tools and resources from CPSA?
Find more resources here. -
The University of British Columbia (UBC) Therapeutics Initiative provides BC clinicians with timely evidence, personalized prescribing data, and recommendations to support better prescribing and better health for patients. We offer feedback on prescribing, including antimicrobials. To sign up, prescribers (Family Physicians and Nurse Practitioners) can read more and register at https://www.ti.ubc.ca/portrait/.
-
Information for this section will be available once the provincial/territorial intervention has been implemented.
-
Information for this section will be available once the provincial/territorial intervention has been implemented.
-
Information for this section will be available once the provincial/territorial intervention has been implemented.
-
Information for this section will be available once the provincial/territorial intervention has been implemented.
-
Information for this section will be available once the provincial/territorial intervention has been implemented.
-
Family physicians in Quebec can visit these websites for more information:
-
Who is involved?
The data collection and analysis for this quality improvement project is a collaborative effort between the Saskatchewan Health Authority Antimicrobial Stewardship Program and the Saskatchewan Ministry of Health. Additional support for this project is provided by Choosing Wisely Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada.
Where did we get these data?
The data are meant to provide insights into your own antibiotic prescribing practice and promote quality improvement for better patient care, where applicable. The data are not shared with anyone but the individual prescriber. Data for this report were derived from the Saskatchewan Ministry of Health Drug Plan and Extended Benefits Branch database for the number of antibiotics prescribed and the Medical Services Branch database for the number of patient encounters. We have also provided data on peer comparison to give context to the findings. Physicians were excluded from the intervention if they did not have antibiotic prescriptions for the most recent year of data.
How did we define the antibiotic prescribing rate?
The antibiotic prescribing rate is defined as the number of oral antibiotics prescribed by an individual provider in a given time period (e.g., monthly) divided by the number of patient encounters in the same time period. This number is multiplied by 1000 to give a normalized measure of the number of antibiotic prescriptions per 1000 patient visits.
Total antibiotic prescribing was defined as the total number of oral antibiotic prescriptions written by an individual that were dispensed by an outpatient pharmacy. We cannot determine if the patient took the antibiotic, only that it was dispensed to them. Your prescribing rate was adjusted for patient volume as described above.
How did we define your peers for comparison?
Your peers were defined as other family physicians in Saskatchewan. Physicians within the lowest prescribing quartile represent an achievable target for many family physicians in Saskatchewan. As a society, we overuse antibiotics, particularly for respiratory tract infections, and in Saskatchewan specifically, we use more antibiotics than most other provinces and territories across Canada. We encourage you to use the tools provided in this letter, as well as your data, to reflect on your own antibiotic prescribing practice.
-
Information for this section will be available once the provincial/territorial intervention has been implemented.
-
Are you interested in receiving feedback electronically?
You may be eligible for Ontario Health’s MyPractice Primary Care Plus (with Screening Activity Report data). This is a confidential report that provides family physicians with an informative perspective on their individual practice and patients. The report is available on the eReport platform through ONE ID registration. To learn more, visit https://www.cancercareontario.ca/en/primary-care-reports
Where did we get these data?
These data are meant for your own quality improvement. We cannot share it with anyone except you. The data for this report were derived from the Ontario Drug Benefit (ODB) database housed at ICES (formerly, the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences). The ODB database captures >99% of dispensed prescriptions, but is limited to patients ≥ 65 years of age; however, antibiotic prescribing in patients ≥ 65 is highly correlated with overall antibiotic use for all age groups among Ontario family physicians. We have also provided data on peer comparison to give context to the findings. Physicians were excluded from the intervention if they saw less than 100 patients ≥ 65 years of age or prescribed less than 10 antibiotics to patients ≥ 65 years of age in the most recent year or two of the three years of data.
How did we define antibiotic prescribing appropriateness?
Some physicians received data on antibiotic prescribing appropriateness. Antibiotic prescriptions that were most likely unnecessary was defined as an antibiotic prescription dispensed to a patient within 3 days after one of the diagnostic codes in the table below for a respiratory infection that rarely requires antibiotics, and no other diagnostic code used in that 3-day period. This definition has been previously used to study antibiotic prescribing appropriateness in Ontario, and based on the best available evidence for appropriate antibiotic prescribing. Approximately 20% of patients with acute sinusitis will benefit from antibiotics with criteria found in the Cold Standard toolkit (http://bit.ly/abx-pc).
How did we define your peers for comparison?
Total antibiotic prescribing was defined as the total number of oral antibiotic prescriptions written by yourself, to a patient ≥ 65 years of age, that were dispensed by an outpatient pharmacy. We cannot tell if your patient took the antibiotic, only that it was dispensed to them. Your prescribing rate was adjusted for patient volume. Your peers were defined as other family physicians in Ontario that met the inclusion criteria.
Data were obtained from ICES (using a combination of OHIP billings and ODB drug claims). Physicians with the lowest prescribing quartile represent an achievable target for many family physicians in Ontario. As a society, we overuse antibiotics, particularly for respiratory tract infections. For context, in Sweden, physicians prescribe about half the number of antibiotics per population. Approximately one quarter of antibiotics prescribed by primary care physicians in Ontario are unnecessary. We encourage you to use the tools provided in this letter, as well as your data, to reflect on your antibiotic prescribing.
What is the evidence for shorter antibiotic durations?
Numerous randomized controlled trials have been performed for common infectious diseases that have consistently showed that shorter courses of antibiotics are non-inferior to standard or longer courses. This does not mean that all patients can be treated with shorter durations and consideration should be given to the type of drug used, comorbidities and the patient’s response to therapy. Follow-up to ensure improvement and expected resolution is important. The studies have been nicely summarized at https://www.bradspellberg.com/shorter-is-better.
How do I get more information or opt out?
For questions about this report or to opt out of future reports in Ontario please complete this form: https://surveys.publichealthontario.ca/SE/245/FeedbackReportsOptOutForm/
Sources:
About Choosing Wisely Canada
Choosing Wisely Canada is the national voice for reducing unnecessary tests and treatments in health care. One of its important functions is to help clinicians and patients engage in conversations that lead to smart and effective care choices.
Web: choosingwiselycanada.org
Email: info@choosingwiselycanada.org
Twitter: @ChooseWiselyCA
Facebook: /ChoosingWiselyCanada
References
Example references used to guide duration recommendations.
- Appropriate Use Intervention Summary: Audit and Feedback
- Effect of Antibiotic-Prescribing Feedback to High-Volume Primary Care Physicians on Number of Antibiotic PrescriptionsAntibiotic-Prescribing Feedback to High-Volume Physicians
- Mailed Feedback to Primary Care Physicians on Antibiotic Prescribing for Patients Aged 65 Years and Older: Pragmatic, Factorial Randomised Controlled Trial
- Audit and Feedback Interventions for Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Process Evaluation of Two Large Randomized Controlled Trials To Understand Factors Influencing Family Physicians’ Use of Antibiotic Audit and Feedback Reports
- Best Practice Guidance for Antibiotic Audit and Feedback Interventions in Primary Care
- Sustainable Access to Effective Antibiotics
The Cold Standard
A toolkit for using antibiotics wisely for the management of respiratory tract infections.
Viral Prescription Pads
Adult and pediatric prescription pads that provide other ways to treat colds and flu without the use of antibiotics.
Delayed Prescription
Steps to follow before filling an antibiotic prescription.
For more information about this research study, please contact the CANBuild-AMR program manager (asp@oahpp.ca)
