Audit and Feedback
Improving Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Care
Audit and Feedback (A&F) is a quality improvement strategy that involves measuring of professional performance, with results subsequently provided to clinicians and/or their teams to encourage positive change in clinical practice. A&F has been rigorously studied and shown to improve antibiotics prescribing in primary care as demonstrated by this systematic review and meta-analysis of 56 randomized controlled trials.
The design and implementation of A&F is critical for its success. Key considerations are considering how the desired outcomes link to a particular change in behaviour. Recipients of A&F should be able to understand the data presented to them within seconds, and be able to connect the data to their prescribing behaviours. Brehaut et al summarized 15 suggestions for optimizing the effectiveness of A&F. Schwartz et al provide 13 best practice recommendations for implementing antibiotic A&F in primary care. This toolkit can help with designing and assessing these A&F interventions.
Best Practice Guidance for Antibiotic Audit and Feedback Interventions in Primary Care
Example text can go here.
Toolkit for Designing and Evaluating an A&F: Checklist
Example text can go here.
Canadian ANtibiotic prescribing feedback initiative: Building a national framework to combat AntiMicrobial Resistance in primary care (CANBuild-AMR)
Background: Rising antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a threat for modern medicine and society as a whole. In 2019, over 1.2 million global deaths were attributable to AMR. Misuse and overuse of antibiotics are important contributors to this health crisis and national actions are necessary to slow AMR to mitigate its detrimental impacts where we can no longer effectively treat bacterial infectious diseases. Over 90% of antibiotic usage in humans is in the community setting, and 25-50% of these antibiotic prescriptions are unnecessary, making this sector a critical partner for antimicrobial stewardship efforts. Peer comparison audit and feedback is rooted in behavioural science and is effective at improving antibiotic prescribing. Mailed antibiotic feedback letters reduce overall antibiotic prescribing, save money, and does not increase the risk for serious bacterial infections. Previous work has shown that physicians use this data to reflect on their antibiotic prescribing practices and make small changes to improve appropriate antibiotic prescribing. Tools from Choosing Wisely Canada are available to support Using Antibiotic Wisely.
Aim: This project aims to develop a Canadian AMR collaboration to reduce antibiotic use through prescriber feedback in primary care. It will build national capacity to deliver feedback at scale and evaluate its effectiveness. The CANBuild-AMR project will standardize and optimize feedback interventions, providing an efficient evaluation mechanism. By expanding existing programs, we will reduce unnecessary antibiotic use, improve patient care quality, lower costs, and combat AMR.
Methods: CANBuild_AMR has developed a steering committee and developed an antibiotic feedback intervention incorporating principles of behavioural science and best practices for audit and feedback. The letter was developed through stakeholder engagement from across Canada and through user tested design from front line family physicians. All participating P/Ts will leverage existing programs and resources to provide antibiotic prescribing feedback to prescribers. The goal is for most family physicians in Canada to receive antibiotic prescribing feedback in November 2025.
Ethics: Antibiotic prescribing feedback is a quality improvement initiative that can be delivered without informed consent. Physician can opt out of future feedback reports through their respective province or territory. The study has been approved by the Public Health Ontario Research Ethics Board (X) and at each local P/T as required.
If you received antibiotic prescribing feedback and looking for more information and/or references please select your province or territory below:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Are you interested in receiving feedback electronically?
You may be eligible for Ontario Health’s MyPractice Primary Care Plus (with Screening Activity Report data). This is a confidential report that provides family physicians with an informative perspective on their individual practice and patients. The report is available on the eReport platform through ONE ID registration. To learn more, visit https://www.cancercareontario.ca/en/primary-care-reports
Where did we get these data?
These data are meant for your own quality improvement. We cannot share it with anyone except you. The data for this report were derived from the Ontario Drug Benefit (ODB) database housed at ICES (formerly, the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences). The ODB database captures >99% of dispensed prescriptions, but is limited to patients ≥ 65 years of age; however, antibiotic prescribing in patients ≥ 65 is highly correlated with overall antibiotic use for all age groups among Ontario family physicians. We have also provided data on peer comparison to give context to the findings. Physicians were excluded from the intervention if they saw less than 100 patients ≥ 65 years of age or prescribed less than 10 antibiotics to patients ≥ 65 years of age in the most recent year or two of the three years of data.
How did we define antibiotic prescribing appropriateness?
Some physicians received data on antibiotic prescribing appropriateness. Antibiotic prescriptions that were most likely unnecessary was defined as an antibiotic prescription dispensed to a patient within 3 days after one of the diagnostic codes in the table below for a respiratory infection that rarely requires antibiotics, and no other diagnostic code used in that 3-day period. This definition has been previously used to study antibiotic prescribing appropriateness in Ontario, and based on the best available evidence for appropriate antibiotic prescribing. Approximately 20% of patients with acute sinusitis will benefit from antibiotics with criteria found in the Cold Standard toolkit (http://bit.ly/abx-pc).
Condition OHIP Dx Codes Asthma 493 Common Cold 460, 464 Influenza 487 Acute sinusitis 461 Chronic sinusitis 473 Acute bronchitis 466 How did we define your peers for comparison?
Total antibiotic prescribing was defined as the total number of oral antibiotic prescriptions written by yourself, to a patient ≥ 65 years of age, that were dispensed by an outpatient pharmacy. We cannot tell if your patient took the antibiotic, only that it was dispensed to them. Your prescribing rate was adjusted for patient volume. Your peers were defined as other family physicians in Ontario that met the inclusion criteria.
Data were obtained from ICES (using a combination of OHIP billings and ODB drug claims). Physicians with the lowest prescribing quartile represent an achievable target for many family physicians in Ontario. As a society, we overuse antibiotics, particularly for respiratory tract infections. For context, in Sweden, physicians prescribe about half the number of antibiotics per population. Approximately one quarter of antibiotics prescribed by primary care physicians in Ontario are unnecessary. We encourage you to use the tools provided in this letter, as well as your data, to reflect on your antibiotic prescribing.
What is the evidence for shorter antibiotic durations?
Numerous randomized controlled trials have been performed for common infectious diseases that have consistently showed that shorter courses of antibiotics are non-inferior to standard or longer courses. This does not mean that all patients can be treated with shorter durations and consideration should be given to the type of drug used, comorbidities and the patient’s response to therapy. Follow-up to ensure improvement and expected resolution is important. The studies have been nicely summarized at https://www.bradspellberg.com/shorter-is-better.
How do I get more information or opt out?
For questions about this report or to opt out of future reports in Ontario please complete this form: https://surveys.publichealthontario.ca/SE/245/FeedbackReportsOptOutForm/
Sources:
About Choosing Wisely Canada
Choosing Wisely Canada is the national voice for reducing unnecessary tests and treatments in health care. One of its important functions is to help clinicians and patients engage in conversations that lead to smart and effective care choices.
Web: choosingwiselycanada.org
Email: info@choosingwiselycanada.org
Twitter: @ChooseWiselyCA
Facebook: /ChoosingWiselyCanada
References
Example references used to guide duration recommendations.
- Antibiotic-Prescribing Feedback to High-Volume Physicians
- RCT: Mailed feedback to physicians on antibiotic prescribing
- A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on Audit and Feedback Interventions
- Factors influencing physicians’ use of antibiotic audit and feedback reports
- Best practice guidance for antibiotic audit and feedback interventions in primary care
- Sustainable access to effective antibiotics
The Cold Standard
A toolkit for using antibiotics wisely for the management of respiratory tract infections.
Viral Prescription Pads
Adult and pediatric prescription pads that provide other ways to treat colds and flu without the use of antibiotics.
Delayed Prescription
Steps to follow before filling an antibiotic prescription.
For more information about this research study, please contact the CANBuild-AMR program manager (asp@oahpp.ca)